Spiritual or Religious ?

The Bible As A Guide

The Bible is considered ‘God inspired’ and universally binding, however its ancient origins demand careful interpretation. Centuries of tradition, inconsistencies and reader bias often cloud its messages. Consider slavery, which the Bible universally accepts, while today society rightly rejects slavery as immoral. By reading the Bible through the lens of Jesus, God ‘s agent of clarification and change, focus shifts toward a path of humility, compassion, and grace..
Today, the Bible is used, to the disadvantage of marginalize weak or vulnerable, by clinging to a “Word of God” that refuses to evolve. Forgotten is that Jesus was a radical, “inconvenient” Jew who upended the religious status quo. He pivoted faith away from the survival based biases that those in power benefited from and toward a path of grace, compassion, and purpose. In this light, the Bible is not a closed book of rules, but a living pillar of spiritual strength, with diverse perspective.
The Bible is no longer a puzzle being pieced together. Instead it is a series of unique snapshots, each valuable for the moment it was taken, that empowers our free will. We are the ones who are to weigh its core truths against that series of unique snapshots, as they apply to building a stronger, more resilient community. By choosing compassion, purpose over greed and connection over loneliness, we use these sacred perspectives to create a life that serves the community, rather than for control or the greed of those who have appropriated biblical credibility. Consulting the Bible is not a lack of faith, rather it is a commitment to build a better life in the process.
Let the Bible share Its insights while remembering the threads of harmony Jesus offered that brought evolution. Instead of looking through the lens of other people’s ambitions, let the actual text speak for itself and expose potentially different meanings. Use your free will to interpret the Bible’s diverse perspectives personally for a harmony that cannot be hijacked.

The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)

The Jewish Scriptures were recognized in three stages, often referred to as the Tanakh (Torah, Nevi’im, and Ketuvim).The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)
• c. 400 BCE: The Torah (Genesis–Deuteronomy) – The Return from Exile. After returning from Babylon, Ezra the Scribe publicly read the Law, formalizing its status as the foundation of Jewish life.
c. 200 BCE: The Prophets (Joshua–Malachi) – The Hellenistic Pressure. As Greek culture spread, Jewish leaders sought to preserve the “official” voices of their messengers to maintain national identity.
c. 90–100 CE: The Writings (Psalms, Esther, etc.) – The Council of Jamnia (Yavne). After the Romans destroyed the Temple in 70 CE, Jewish scholars met to solidify their heritage. While not a formal “vote,” this period settled the status of debated books like Song of Solomon and Ecclesiastes.

The New Testament

The New Testament took roughly 350 years to reach its final form. The catalyst was often the need to distinguish “truth” from “heresy.”
• The Early Recognition (c. 50–150 CE) – Books: Mark (~ 70 CE, Matthew ~80 CE, John and Luke ~100 CE. Paul’s letters to the churches 48 to 64 CE. The Death of the Apostles. As the eyewitnesses died, the church needed written records to ensure the oral tradition wasn’t lost or corrupted.
• The First “List” (c. 140 CE) – The Marcionite Heresy. A teacher named Marcion tried to throw out the Old Testament and most of the New Testament (keeping only a butchered Luke and Paul). This backfired and forced the mainstream Church to define exactly which books were authentic to counter Marcion’s “short list.”
• The Muratorian Fragment (c. 170 CE). – This is the oldest known list of New Testament books. It included 22 of the 27 books we have today, showing that a “core” was already universally accepted by the late 2nd century.
• The Gospels and Paul’s writings began to be considered scripture as the oral history of Christ’s words were replaced by the Bible’s content.
The Council of Rome (AD 382)The Athanasius Easter Letter (367 CE). Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria wrote a letter listing the 27 books of the New Testament exactly as we have them today. Under Pope Damasus I.who formalized the 73-book canon, was the first time the 27 books of the New Testament were officially listed together with the 46 books of the Old Testament (including the “Deuterocanonical” books like Tobit and Judith). This council’s list provided the “blueprint” for St. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, which became the standard Bible for the next 1,000 years. The Councils of Hippo (393) & Carthage (397) reaffirmed the 73 books (46 OT, 27 NT) to ensure that all regional churches were reading the same scriptures during liturgy. They specifically stated that “nothing should be read in church under the name of divine scriptures” except these books.

The Reformation and the Deuterocanon

In the 16th century, the Bible’s contents were challenged again, leading to the different versions we see today (Catholic vs. Protestant).
The Protestant Reformation (1517). Martin Luther moved the “Apocrypha” (books like Tobit and Maccabees) to a separate section, questioning their authority because they weren’t in the Hebrew Bible. Removed/Relegated: 7 Old Testament books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch) plus parts of Esther and Daniel. Luther initially questioned New Testament books like James, Jude, Hebrews, and Revelation, calling James an “epistle of straw,” though he eventually kept them. The “Hebrew Truth”: Reformers wanted to use the Hebrew Bible used by Jews at the time (the Masoretic Text), which did not include the 7 books written in Greek. Some of these books (like 2 Maccabees) supported doctrines the Reformers rejected, such as purgatory and prayers for the dead. The Luther Bible (German) and later the Geneva Bible and King James Version (which originally kept these books in a separate “Apocrypha” section before they were removed entirely by printing societies in the 1800s).
The Council of Trent (1546). In response to Luther, the Catholic Church issued a definitive decree (the first “infallible” list for Catholics) confirming that the Deuterocanonical books were indeed fully inspired scripture. Dogmatically “locked” the 73-book canon. This was the first time the Church issued an infallible definition of the Bible’s contents, attaching an “anathema” (excommunication) to anyone who rejected these books. It opposed the Protestant removal of books and to clarify once and for all what constituted “Sacred Scripture” for Catholics. The Clementine Vulgate was the result (an updated, authoritative version of Jerome’s Vulgate).
In 1826 the British Bible Society the removed “Apocrypha” section entirely resulting in the basis of the Protestant Bibles of today.

Conclusion

The Bible has been edited, curated, and at times, hijacked. When interpretations ignore facts to favor the powerful, the vulnerable pay the price. We need guardrails against this unchecked message appropriation and use. The story of Jesus is exactly that: a guard rail against greed and control that ends in the use of deadly force that the status quo takes on. Don’t settle for a version of the truth that serves someone else’s ambition. Explore the text for yourself to find the Bible’s greatest gifts are the options it provides